Licensing and franchising are suitable in different situations. Explain how?
Yes, it is right to say that licensing and franchising are suitable in different situations. For a company looking to expand, franchising and licensing are often appealing business models. In a franchising model, the franchisee uses another firm's successful business model and brand name to operate what is effectively Em independent branch of the company. The franchiser maintains a considerable degree of control over the operations and processes used by the franchisee, but also helps with things like branding and marketing support that aid the franchise. The franchiser also typically ensures that branches do not cannibalize each other's revenues.
Under a licensing model, a company sells licenses to other (typically smaller) companies to use intellectual property (IP), brand, design or business programs. These licenses are usually non-exclusive, which means they can be sold to multiple competing companies serving the same market. In this arrangement, the licensing company may exercise control over how its IP is used but does not control the business operations of the licensee.
Both models require that the franchisee/licensee make payments to the original business that owns the brand or intellectual property. There are laws that govern the franchising model and define what constitutes franchising; some agreements end up being legally viewed as franchising even if they were originally drawn up as licensing agreements. It can be clarified from the differences given below:
Reebok orders for footballs to local manufacturers of Ludhiana and then sells it all over the world. It is an example of what?
State the important changes being observed in composition of India's external trade since 2007-08.
When a middleman is involved in handling export procedure, then it is called by what name?
"International trade benefits both the parties involve."Do you agree? Justify your answer:
Discuss the major trends in India's foreign trade. Also list the major products that India trades with other countries.
In what ways is exporting a better way of entering into international markets than setting up wholly owned subsidiaries abroad.
"Wholly owned subsidiary is a more investing, more risky and less return giving venture."Do you agree? Substantiate your answer.
Discuss briefly the factors that govern the choice of mode of entry into international business.
Differentiate between contract manufacturing and setting up wholly owned production subsidiary abroad.